Note
Go to the end to download the full example code.
Ramp-sampled readout#
The Cartesian readouts you have used so far sample on the flat top of the readout lobe, so the area under the ramps is not sampled. Sampling through the ramps as well covers the same extent of k-space in a shorter lobe, at the cost of sample positions that are not evenly spaced. In this Tour you write a Cartesian readout module that samples through the ramps, compare its duration with the flat-top design at the same resolution, and measure the sample spacing along the line from the k-space analysis.
Prerequisites: lessons 9 and 10 of the course.
The module interface, and the events a module publishes, are described in Sequence modules and functions.
Ramp sampling#
A readout lobe of area \(N/\mathrm{FOV}\) resolves an \(N\)-point matrix over the field of view. A flat-top design samples only the plateau, which has to carry the whole area, so the lobe is as long as the plateau plus its two ramps. A ramp-sampled design puts the ADC window across the whole lobe: the plateau is shorter and the lobe with it, at the same gradient amplitude and slew rate.
The ADC samples at a fixed dwell time. Where the gradient changes, equal steps in time are unequal steps in k, so the sample positions are denser on the ramps and the data need regridding before a Fourier transform.
Readout module#
This is the same kind of class you wrote in lesson 10. init_module
assigns self.seq, adds the blocks of the layout to it and sets
center, which for a readout is
the interval from the start of the module to the echo. Events bound to local
variables are published under those names, so a scan loop reaches the phase
encode as readout.gy_pre without the module returning anything.
The prephaser has half the area of the whole lobe, ramps included, so the echo lands at the middle of the lobe rather than the middle of its flat top. The acquisition window is centred on the lobe, clears the ADC dead time at both ends, and is sampled at the requested rate.
import math
import numpy as np
import pypulseqpp as pp
from pypulseqpp import sequences
class RampSampledLineReadout(sequences.SequenceModule):
"""Cartesian line readout acquired across the whole readout lobe.
Parameters
----------
system : pypulseqpp.Opts
System limits.
rf : RfEvent
The pulse that opens the repetition.
gz : GradEvent, optional
Its selection gradient, played in the same block.
gz_reph : GradEvent, optional
Its rephaser, played in the prewinder block.
fov : float
Isotropic in-plane field of view (m).
matrix : int
Isotropic in-plane matrix size.
readout_bandwidth_hz : float, optional
Requested ADC sampling rate (Hz). ``bandwidth_hz`` reports the rate
the ADC raster admits.
spoiling_cycles : float, optional
Dephasing left on the read axis at the end of the repetition, in
cycles across one voxel.
Attributes
----------
gx_pre : TrapEvent
Readout prephaser, half the area of the lobe.
gy_pre : TrapEvent
Phase encode at its largest step, for the loop to scale.
gx : TrapEvent
Readout lobe, sampled from ramp to ramp.
adc : AdcEvent
The acquisition window, centred on the lobe.
gx_spoil : TrapEvent
Rewinds the second half of the line and adds the spoiling.
gy_rew : TrapEvent
The negated phase encode, scaled by the loop alongside ``gy_pre``.
echo_time : float
From the RF isodelay to the echo (s).
center_sample : int
Index of the sample at the echo.
bandwidth_hz : float
Achieved ADC sampling rate (Hz).
"""
def init_module(
self,
system: pp.Opts,
rf,
gz=None,
gz_reph=None,
*,
fov: float,
matrix: int,
readout_bandwidth_hz: float = 500e3,
spoiling_cycles: float = 4.0,
) -> None:
gx = pp.make_trapezoid("x", area=matrix / fov, system=system)
span = pp.calc_duration(gx)
dwell = (
math.floor(1.0 / readout_bandwidth_hz / system.adc_raster_time)
* system.adc_raster_time
)
# The window is centred on the lobe and clears the ADC dead time at
# both ends, so the echo falls between two samples of it.
divisor = int(system.adc_samples_divisor)
usable = span - 2 * system.adc_dead_time
n_samples = int(usable / dwell + 1e-9) // divisor * divisor
adc = pp.make_adc(
num_samples=n_samples,
dwell=dwell,
delay=pp.round_to_raster(
0.5 * (span - n_samples * dwell), system.adc_raster_time
),
system=system,
)
gx_pre = pp.make_trapezoid("x", area=-0.5 * gx.area, system=system)
gy_pre = pp.make_trapezoid("y", area=0.5 * matrix / fov, system=system)
gy_rew = pp.scale_grad(gy_pre, -1.0)
gx_spoil = pp.make_trapezoid(
"x", area=-0.5 * gx.area + spoiling_cycles * matrix / fov, system=system
)
self.seq = pp.Sequence(system)
self.seq.add_block(*filter(None, (rf, gz)))
self.seq.add_block(*filter(None, (gx_pre, gy_pre, gz_reph)))
self.seq.add_block(gx, adc)
self.seq.add_block(gx_spoil, gy_rew)
rf_center = float(rf.delay) + float(rf.center)
self.echo_time = (
pp.calc_duration(*filter(None, (rf, gz)))
- rf_center
+ pp.calc_duration(*filter(None, (gx_pre, gy_pre, gz_reph)))
+ 0.5 * span
)
self.center = rf_center + self.echo_time
self.center_sample = round((0.5 * span - adc.delay) / dwell)
self.bandwidth_hz = 1.0 / dwell
Readout duration#
Both designs sample the same extent of k-space, so both resolve the same matrix over the same field of view. The flat-top design covers that extent on its plateau alone, and its ramps add duration without adding samples. Here is a 192-point line over 220 mm, at the same gradient amplitude in both lobes:
system = pp.Opts(
max_grad=40.0,
grad_unit="mT/m",
max_slew=150.0,
slew_unit="T/m/s",
rf_dead_time=100e-6,
rf_ringdown_time=30e-6,
adc_dead_time=10e-6,
)
FOV = 220e-3
MATRIX = 192
ramp_sampled = pp.make_trapezoid("x", area=MATRIX / FOV, system=system)
flat_topped = pp.make_trapezoid(
"x",
amplitude=ramp_sampled.amplitude,
flat_time=pp.round_to_raster(
MATRIX / FOV / ramp_sampled.amplitude, system.grad_raster_time
),
system=system,
)
for name, lobe in (("ramp-sampled", ramp_sampled), ("flat top only", flat_topped)):
print(
f"{name:14} lobe {pp.calc_duration(lobe) * 1e6:6.0f} us, "
f"flat {lobe.flat_time * 1e6:6.0f} us, amplitude "
f"{lobe.amplitude / system.gamma * 1e3:5.1f} mT/m"
)
ramp-sampled lobe 800 us, flat 240 us, amplitude 39.4 mT/m
flat top only lobe 1080 us, flat 520 us, amplitude 39.4 mT/m
Repetition#
The module follows a slice-selective excitation, from which it takes the pulse, the selection gradient and the rephaser. The printout lists the events it publishes, its sample count and bandwidth, and its timing:
excitation = sequences.SpatialSelectiveExcitation(
system, flip_angle_deg=12.0, thickness_m=5e-3, duration_s=3e-3
)
readout = RampSampledLineReadout(
system,
excitation.rf,
excitation.gz,
excitation.gz_reph,
fov=FOV,
matrix=MATRIX,
)
print("events:", ", ".join(sorted(vars(readout.events))))
print(
f"{int(readout.adc.num_samples)} samples at {readout.bandwidth_hz * 1e-3:.0f} kHz, "
f"echo at sample {readout.center_sample}"
)
print(
f"TE {readout.echo_time * 1e3:.3f} ms over a {readout.duration * 1e3:.3f} ms "
"repetition"
)
events: adc, gx, gx_pre, gx_spoil, gy_pre, gy_rew, gz, gz_reph, rf
388 samples at 500 kHz, echo at sample 194
TE 2.520 ms over a 6.600 ms repetition
Sample spacing along the line#
calculate_kspace is one of the analyses a module forwards to the sequence
it built, so the sample positions come from the events themselves rather than
from the design arithmetic. The spacing is finest on the ramps, where the
gradient is weakest, and largest on the plateau, where it remains below the
Nyquist spacing \(1/\mathrm{FOV}\). Consecutive samples at the start and
at the end of the window, taken while the gradient is near zero, are almost
coincident in k, so these edge samples are redundant. The nonuniform sample
positions require regridding during reconstruction.

k spacing from 0.17 to 3.36 1/m, Nyquist 4.55 1/m
Scan loop#
The loop scales the published phase encode per line and labels the acquisition; the rest of the layout is played as the module laid it out.
seq = pp.Sequence(system=system)
for line in range(MATRIX):
ky = (line - MATRIX // 2) / (MATRIX / 2)
seq.add_block(excitation.rf, excitation.gz, pp.make_label("LIN", "SET", line))
seq.add_block(readout.gx_pre, pp.scale_grad(readout.gy_pre, ky), excitation.gz_reph)
seq.add_block(readout.gx, readout.adc)
seq.add_block(readout.gx_spoil, pp.scale_grad(readout.gy_rew, ky))
print(
f"{seq.num_blocks} blocks, {seq.duration()[0]:.2f} s, timing {seq.check_timing()[0]}"
)
768 blocks, 1.27 s, timing True
The diagram shows one repetition.
seq.paper_plot(tr=1)

Specification#
What this Tour built, stated the way you would ask an agent for it:
Write a pypulseqpp SequenceModule RampSampledLineReadout(system, rf,
gz, gz_reph, fov, matrix, readout_bandwidth_hz=500e3,
spoiling_cycles=4): a Cartesian line readout whose readout lobe has
area matrix/fov and whose ADC window is centred on the whole lobe,
ramps included, at a dwell on the ADC raster and clear of the ADC
dead time. The prephaser has half the lobe's area; publish gx_pre,
gy_pre, gx, adc, gx_spoil and gy_rew, and set center to the echo.
For 40 mT/m, 150 T/m/s, 220 mm and 192 points, compare the lobe
with a flat-top lobe of the same amplitude, read the sample
spacing from calculate_kspace against 1/FOV, and play it over 192
phase encodes with a LIN label and check the timing.
Total running time of the script: (0 minutes 0.289 seconds)